Saturday, April 26, 2025

Monday, April 7, 2025

SnipGrid 36 is a gambling game hosted at some of LLP's very "special" casinos!

It's played using a special table (see Fig. 1) and supervised by a croupier (always female, gorgeous, and wearing a very provoking "sexy croupier" costume!)

In place of the wheel used in roulette, there is a grid of 36 squares from which a computer selects one random square on each turn.

Each player places his bet (using his player control panel), and wins or loses according to the random square chosen. The types of bets are shown in Fig. 2. For instance, if the player bets "N" (north) then he's betting on the chosen square being in the top half of the grid. If he bets "EVEN" then he's betting on the chosen square having an even number, etc. The player can also bet on the chosen square being in a specific row or column, a specific block of two or fours squares, or a specific single square.

The numbers underneath each bet indicate the odds of winning. For example, "N" shows "1/2" (i.e., 50%). However, if the player bets 1,000 credits, then he gets at least 4,000 back (including his original 1,000 credit stake). That's double the 2,000 that you'd expect. Very generous!

Well, not really. It's here that we should explain the unique feature of SnipGrid 36. Whenever he makes a bet, each player also has to choose from 1 to 6 "snippety squares", which have to be squares where he'd lose the bet. For example, in the case of an "N" bet, the snippety squares must in the lower half of the grid, i.e., where the bet would lose.

If the player chooses one snippety square, then he gets double the odds value if he wins the bet. In the case of an "N" bet, the odds are 2 to 1, so he gets a return of 2 x 2 = 4. For every additional snip square chosen, the return doubles yet again. Therefore, taking the example of an "N" bet again and going from 1 snip square up to 6, the return is 4, 8, 16, 32, 64 and 128! That means that if the player puts down an "N" bet of 1,000 credits, chooses 6 snip squares, and wins, then he gets a whopping 128,000 credits!

All that seems unbelievably generous. But there's a small drawback. If the computer chooses a losing square, then the player just loses his stake. But if it chooses one of his snip squares, then he's in danger of losing a lot more!

You see, if a player's snip square is chosen, he has to pay a visit to "the pedestal". This is an actual metal pedestal in the center of the gaming room, which the unfortunate guy has to stand on while he awaits his fate! The pedestal chooses either "snip" or "reprieve", with each having a 50% chance. If the player is lucky enough to get a "reprieve" then he's spared, and can continue playing (if that's what he wants). However, if he gets a "snip" then the pedestal triggers his chastiring, and off come his balls there and then!

So, it's a case of "the bigger the risk, the bigger the reward". For a lot of LLP couples, SnipGrid 36 has permanently solved their sex credit issues (without having to sacrifice hubby's nuts). Others, though, are not so fortunate! If a player has a run of really good luck, then he can win an astronomical number of credits! So much so that casinos set a lifetime limit of 500,000,000 credits on the total payout to any particular individual. Needless to say, that's still more than enough to keep a wife very, very happy for an extremely long time!

Incidentally, here's an interesting fact about SnipGrid 36. If a player only ever chooses one snip square, then the chance of him losing his balls is 1 in 72 per bet (a 1 in 36 chance of his snip square being chosen, followed by a  50/50 chance of the pedestal choosing "snip"). If he continues to play like that, then his overall chance of losing his nuts goes above 50% on his 50th bet. Of course, if he chooses more than one snip square, then his odds quickly become worse!

Finally, let's look at the game in progress shown in Fig. 1. The computer has just selected square 21. That means that player 1 has won his bet. He put 1,000 credits on "ODD" and chose just one snip square (indicated in red). The odds for "ODD" are 1 in 2, so the player gets 1,000 x 2 x 2 = 4,000 credits (the second "x 2" being for the single snip square). Player 2 has lost his bet of 2,000 credits on "SW". He took a bigger risk because he chose three snip squares. Had he won, he would've got 2,000 x 4 x 8 = 64,000 credits ("x 4" because the odds of winning an "SW" bet are 1in 4, and "x 8" because of the three snip squares). Player 3 must really have been feeling lucky! He bet 10,000 credits on "ROW C" and chose the maximum six snip squares. Had he won, he would have gotten a massive10,000 x 6 x 64 = 3,840,000 credits! Unfortunately, not only did he lose the bet, square 21 is also one of his snip squares! Therefore, he's due for a visit to the pedestal. Which means he's only got a 50/50 chance of keeping his balls!

Wish him luck!!

Mr. Taylor Gets the Snip!














Friday, October 29, 2021

Saturday, September 4, 2021

Castratrix of Thalia!

This is a short piece about a lady LLP guest who got addicted to a fantasy subsim, and has spent too many long years inside it! 

Incidentally, I did the artwork with a different software (paint tool SAI) to the one I usually use (inkscape), so it was a useful learning experience.

Also, I'm quite keen on doing some more explicit stuff showing "Jamilla" in action!




Tuesday, November 13, 2018

A Little Chat



This is the result of a little idea I had regarding the fantastic deballing world known as Ungypt.
Hope you like it.

Regards,
Lamivex.

Thursday, April 27, 2017

The Congregation

This is a short scenario which occurred to me a while ago. I deliberately tried to keep the less important incidental artwork simple, and limit the detailed stuff to the final 'punchline' illustrations.

Tuesday, January 10, 2017

Sacred Fruit

Here’s a smallish piece that was conceived mainly as an explanation of ‘Bullball fruit’ (and a brief introduction to ‘Ungypt’). It ended up being slightly larger than originally intended, but I deliberately didn’t spend too much time on the artwork, as it’s really just an explanation, and isn’t intended as a ‘full on’ scenario.

However, with my next story, I will be ‘cutting to the chase’ (or perhaps I should say, ‘unkindest cutting to the chase’!). Yes, the next one will feature sweating desperate slaves, cruel flashing blades, and flying body parts (no blood though, thanks to LLP chastiring technology)...with all of it happening ‘on camera’!

Incidentally, ‘Sacred Fruit’ contains a subtle reference to an (as yet) ‘undocumented LLP feature’ (an explanation of which will follow in the near future).

Sunday, January 1, 2017

LLP Deballing Zone

This blog will contain artwork and stories derived from my "Ladies' Love Paradise" fantasy that deal with the 'deballing' (i.e. castration) aspects of the LLP universe. As such, the material here is certainly not be for everyone, so please leave now if you think you will be offended. Note however, that no blood or gore is depicted herein (thanks to chastiring technology!).

Explanations, comics and animations relating to LLP can be found on my original blog here.

Regards.

Thursday, December 22, 2016

Wednesday, September 7, 2016

Simple as ABC... (+ a Large Amount of Chagrin!)

Are you sitting comfortably boys and girls?...Then I’ll begin!

Once upon a time, there was a man called Mr. A. He did a picture (let’s call it Painting 1) that, at the time (although not now), he thought was pretty cool. He therefore put it where a lot of people could see it. Mr. B (who was something of an artist) saw Painting 1, presumably liked the idea, and so used it in his own picture (Painting 2). Now, some years after doing Painting 1 (4 years, in fact), Mr. A remembered the idea that inspired Painting 1 and did a similar picture (Painting 3). He then had the following conversation with Mr. C (who had seen Paintings 1, 2 and 3):

Mr. C: Your Painting 3 is kind of similar to Paintings 1 and 2, isn’t it?
Mr. A: Yes, I did Painting 1 a while ago. But I didn’t know about Painting 2 until you just showed it to me. Mr. B must have liked the idea and copied the design, which is…err…OK, I guess.
Mr. C: Ooooh! You big fibber, Mr. A! You know perfectly well you copied the idea from Mr. B's Painting 2! He showed me his picture ages ago (3 years ago, in fact)!
Mr. A: *Grrrrrrrhhhhhhh!!!!! 
*(Indicates extreme irritation and chagrin)

With the above sad story in mind, let me show you a picture (I tell you what, let’s also call it Painting 1!):



(Incidentally, Mr. A would be the first to admit that it’s not very good. He wouldn’t have let me post it here if it weren’t for the purpose of proving a point…)

Next, here’s Painting 2: …No, wait a minute, I can’t show you Painting 2. Apparently, Mr. B gets a bit upset if you post his pictures (he charges people to see them, you know) without permission—even when the idea involved was “acquired” from someone else.

And here’s Painting 3:



Now, in order to clarify a few things, let me draw your attention to this link which is one of the places where Mr. A originally posted Painting 1 (under the username “Tempit”). If you’re watching, Mr. C, please note the date of the post: 10-22-2012.

And just in case anyone has any doubts about the authorship of Painting 1, Mr. A let me have the following screenshot showing the working file (.rif file) for the image loaded into Corel Painter (which was his software of choice at the time). You might notice that the priestess is slightly different because I (or…ahem...rather Mr. A) subsequently experimented with the position of her head. In any case, you can see that the picture consists of a large number of separate layers—rather difficult to fake if you only have the final jpg image.


Well, boys and girls. I suspect you may already have guessed the identity of Mr. A (actually guys, Mr. A is me, you know, Lamivex—you got that didn’t you?) But if you want to know who Messrs. B and C are, you could do worse than wander over to the comments posted here.

I'm told by Mr. A that what would really make him happy is an apology from Mr. C for implying that he’s a liar, and that an honest word of acknowledgment from Mr. B would also be nice...

Mr. A: What’s that winging its way across the evening sky? It looks like...it couldn’t be!...but it is! It’s a Sus scrofa domesticus!!!

THE END

Friday, August 5, 2016

The Adjustian Ranger

This first piece is fairly subdued, but I hope you'll agree it also has a piquant 'nasty edge' to it! I had the idea quite a while ago, but never got round to developing it. Note that the story makes reference to Adjustia, and "snappers".